Google Ups and Downs
I've been signed up to Google's Sitemaps since I first started this site about four months ago. While I recognise that Sitemaps is still in beta I've found it to be the least useful of Googles innovations. It is a worthwhile(ish) idea but it's not currently stable enough for me to bother with any more. I'd always presumed that it might help me get a decent listing of my site into Googles index but, if anything, it's probably hindering me more (at least it seems that way).
While both MSN and Yahoo have done a pretty good job at indexing my site with almost no effort on my part Google has still not managed to index anything but my main page. OK - this isn't the most important site on the Internet but I don't really see the point of expending my energy on helping Google do their job when my effort appears to go unnoticed. So for now I'm just going to see if removing my Sitemap XML file provokes whichever Google spider crawls my site to do a bit of a better job.
On a more positive note Google's Analytics programme seems to be a far more polished affair. They seem to have done a good job at providing both the commonly found web stats while at the same time giving you a bunch of stats that actually mean something and that can be used to make reasonable deductions from (the difference between data and information is something a lot of the creators of web stat applications could do with brushing up on IMO). So I'll be sticking with Google on that score and seeing how it progresses.
While both MSN and Yahoo have done a pretty good job at indexing my site with almost no effort on my part Google has still not managed to index anything but my main page. OK - this isn't the most important site on the Internet but I don't really see the point of expending my energy on helping Google do their job when my effort appears to go unnoticed. So for now I'm just going to see if removing my Sitemap XML file provokes whichever Google spider crawls my site to do a bit of a better job.
On a more positive note Google's Analytics programme seems to be a far more polished affair. They seem to have done a good job at providing both the commonly found web stats while at the same time giving you a bunch of stats that actually mean something and that can be used to make reasonable deductions from (the difference between data and information is something a lot of the creators of web stat applications could do with brushing up on IMO). So I'll be sticking with Google on that score and seeing how it progresses.