The Trouble With A.I. - Part I
The field of A.I. has a problem - public perception.
I'm not sure when it was that A.I. became synonymous with the phrase "robots take over the world (and destroy humanity)!!" but it seems to have happened.
The How & Why
The fact that A.I. has this image is partially due to 'the media' and its representation of the field in fact and fiction. If a story about A.I. is to be reported in the mainstream media it is normally filtered down to its most basic concepts in order to be digestible to the general population. This can lead to reporters searching for analogies and angles to illustrate the concepts involved. Once one reporter decides on an angle for a story then its usually the case that others will follow in their footsteps (lets face it - its hard to be original - and it saves time). Once this public perception has been created it can be very difficult to change.
Altering Public Perception
How is this public perception of A.I. to be changed?
Well - improving peoples understanding of an area can go some way to changing their perception of it. For an example of this you only need to look at the field of computing. Ten or fifteen years ago anyone who spent their out of work hours on a computer would have been labelled 'a geek' - lonely, unsocial individuals who had an unhealthy fascination with an area of no real interest to any 'normal' person. Nowadays the general population has a much greater understanding of computers and an appreciation for their uses. There has been a vast increase in the number of people who use them on a daily basis and would never consider themselves to be 'geeks'. Computers have become accepted because over a period of time the public has slowly been exposed to their usefulness.
Interest != Understanding
The potential for A.I. to follow the same path as computers also exists. The "social" sites I belong to are full of people who claim an interest in A.I. in their personal profiles. The main problem is that an 'interest' does not imply an 'understanding'. I have an interest in physics but I don't claim to understand physics to any great degree. This widespread 'interest' needs to be encouraged and built upon by providing both easy access to background information and a way for people to see where real A.I. has a place in their lives. At the current time A.I. suffers from far too much foresight - "this is what we'll be able to do in 10,20,50,100 years" - It doesn't help! Any discussion based on foresight only serves to hype the potential of A.I. while undermining the small, but significant, advances that are being made. The public need to be shown how these small advances are already being incorporated into their lives.
I'm not sure when it was that A.I. became synonymous with the phrase "robots take over the world (and destroy humanity)!!" but it seems to have happened.
The How & Why
The fact that A.I. has this image is partially due to 'the media' and its representation of the field in fact and fiction. If a story about A.I. is to be reported in the mainstream media it is normally filtered down to its most basic concepts in order to be digestible to the general population. This can lead to reporters searching for analogies and angles to illustrate the concepts involved. Once one reporter decides on an angle for a story then its usually the case that others will follow in their footsteps (lets face it - its hard to be original - and it saves time). Once this public perception has been created it can be very difficult to change.
Altering Public Perception
How is this public perception of A.I. to be changed?
Well - improving peoples understanding of an area can go some way to changing their perception of it. For an example of this you only need to look at the field of computing. Ten or fifteen years ago anyone who spent their out of work hours on a computer would have been labelled 'a geek' - lonely, unsocial individuals who had an unhealthy fascination with an area of no real interest to any 'normal' person. Nowadays the general population has a much greater understanding of computers and an appreciation for their uses. There has been a vast increase in the number of people who use them on a daily basis and would never consider themselves to be 'geeks'. Computers have become accepted because over a period of time the public has slowly been exposed to their usefulness.
Interest != Understanding
The potential for A.I. to follow the same path as computers also exists. The "social" sites I belong to are full of people who claim an interest in A.I. in their personal profiles. The main problem is that an 'interest' does not imply an 'understanding'. I have an interest in physics but I don't claim to understand physics to any great degree. This widespread 'interest' needs to be encouraged and built upon by providing both easy access to background information and a way for people to see where real A.I. has a place in their lives. At the current time A.I. suffers from far too much foresight - "this is what we'll be able to do in 10,20,50,100 years" - It doesn't help! Any discussion based on foresight only serves to hype the potential of A.I. while undermining the small, but significant, advances that are being made. The public need to be shown how these small advances are already being incorporated into their lives.